A New Film Brings The New York Times Obituary Section to Life
Six
 years ago, filmmaker Vanessa Gould wrote to a half-dozen newspapers 
around the world with the news that Eric Joisel, the origami artist who 
was the subject of her first documentary, Between the Folds,
 had died at the age of 53. He had lived in relative obscurity, and had 
it not been for a phone call from the most highly regarded of those 
papers, he would have died in obscurity too.
“I was amazed that The New York Times
 was interested in the life of an unknown French paper artist. After 
this hard, impoverished life he’d led, the acclaim he’d never reach in 
life, now he’d have in death,” Gould said recently by phone from New 
York City, where her new film, Obit,
 opens today. She was impressed by the questions the reporter Margalit 
Fox asked her, many of which she didn’t have the answers to— details 
about Joisel’s early life before she’d met him, contradictory reports 
about a possible early marriage, for instance. But the level of interest
 and devotion to detail from a fellow storyteller stuck with her.
“It
 was a remarkable feeling,” Gould said. “It was like we had a butterfly 
net and we were trying to catch the facts of his life before they flew 
away and slipped out of our hands.” After Joisel’s obituary
 was published, she asked if she could turn the tables, and in 2014 she 
was granted permission to film the paper’s obit writers, both as they 
worked, and in their homes. Watching a writer write, or research, and 
make phone calls, and page through books and scroll through YouTube 
links might conjure the voyeuristic appeal of drying paint, but Gould 
injects the quotidian reality of deskside death reporting with archival 
footage, letting her own natural curiosity guide the story.
The prevailing myth of the Times
 obit is that an advance obituary exists for almost every notable public
 figure, to be plucked out of a file, affixed with an update, and fed 
into the paper. The true picture of a Times obituary writer came first in 1966 via Gay Talese (a detail that will likely one day appear in his own New York Times obituary) with “Mr. Bad News,” an Esquire profile of Alden Whitman, the Times
 reporter who filed obituaries in an era when the job was seen as, well,
 a dead end and certainly bereft of glory; writers got no bylines and 
were expected to stick to the formula. Of all the subjects in Obit,
 Jeff Roth, though not an obit writer (for years has has presided over 
the paper’s archives—“the morgue”), probably most closely resembles the 
idea of the bygone obituarian. Filmed amid rows of wooden file drawers 
and manila folders in his classic newspaperman shirt sleeves, he is 
somewhere between Sisyphus and Bartleby, the Scrivener when he 
cheerfully announces that he is probably about a decade behind on 
filing.
The reality of the Times obit today tends instead to be that a writer is often as unprepared for the initial news of death as the reader. Obit
 recalls, for instance, the shock of the deaths of Michael Jackson, 
Philip Seymour Hoffman, and David Foster Wallace. (“Suicides are the 
most difficult to write,” Margalit Fox said recently by phone from her 
desk at the Times. “They absolutely rip your
 guts out.” Fortunately, she said, she has only had to write a few of 
them. “There is no Emily Post for cold-calling a stranger and saying, 
‘Tell me the cause of death of your loved one, and then I’m going to put
 it in a place where millions of people can see it.’ ”)
“They
 have maybe 8 hours, often less, to learn all they can about a person 
and to write concisely and authoritatively about their lives,” Gould 
said. Death is rarely convenient, and doesn’t always arrive on schedule;
 more often than not the entire enterprise, from research to writing has
 to happen in just a few hours. “I started to see the deep humanity in 
the process. This careful, deliberate act they do every day to put an 
account of a life on the record.”
As Obit
 discovers, the lives that fascinate most are often the ones whose names
 may not have made headlines the first time around. Consider the 
obituary Gould captures Bruce Weber (who, like his colleagues Paul 
Vitello and Douglas Martin has since retired) writing for William P. 
Wilson, an aide to John F. Kennedy in the famous 1960 televised debate 
against Richard Nixon. In the morning, Weber is making his first phone 
calls, segueing from confirming the cause of death to eliciting 
anecdotes from Wilson’s wife about how her husband talked Kennedy into 
wearing makeup—and to letting him apply it. By the time he files, Weber 
has made the argument that Wilson was one of the first people to 
understand that television has, in decades since, “become a tool and a 
weapon that no candidate dares ignore.”
Certainly tenets of the obituary form carry over from the days of “Mr. Bad News.” The Times
 writers are still working with the built-in narrative arc of a life. 
“An obit writer is tasked with taking her subject from the cradle to the
 grave,” Fox said by phone. But these days, as the film shows, the 
obituary writers (who are no longer anonymous; Fox, for example, has 
more than 1,200 bylined obits) approach their job a little more loosely,
 with an appreciation for humor and odd detail, likening their job to 
that of the profile writer. “Alden Whitman was a good stylist, but we 
learn equally from Mark Twain,” said Fox, who cited E. B. White, Tracy 
Kidder, John McPhee, and Murray Kempton—all masters of character 
profiles— among her other influences.
Her own favorite obituary she’s written is one that came after the making of Obit, about a woman named Janet Wolfe
 who, in the course of her 101 years, was sawed in half by Orson Welles,
 hit on by Fellini, and brushed up against the lives of Eartha Kitt, 
Pavarotti, Max Roach, and Ed Koch, to name a few. “She was a wonderful 
New York character, the executive director of the New York City Housing 
Authority Symphony Orchestra, so even that on its face is delightful,” 
Fox said by phone. “Ms. Wolfe was not so much of New York,” Fox writes in Wolfe’s obit, “as she was
 New York: garrulous, generous, whip-smart, endearingly hare-brained, 
unflinchingly direct, occasionally lonely, more than a little ribald, 
supremely well connected and sometimes down but never out.” The obit for
 Janet Wolfe far exceeded the usual 500 to 1,000 words in length; it ran
 on page one.

No comments:
Post a Comment